Information card for entry 2021189
| Chemical name |
1,2-Dihydro-1,1'-bi[thiazolo[3,2-<i>a</i>]quinoline]-10a,10a'-diium diiodide hemihydrate |
| Formula |
C22 H17 I2 N2 O0.5 S2 |
| Calculated formula |
C22 H17 I2 N2 O0.5 S2 |
| SMILES |
[I-].[I-].s1c2[n+](c3c(cc2)cccc3)c(c1)C1[n+]2c(SC1)ccc1ccccc21.O |
| Title of publication |
Why are reactions of 2- and 8-thioquinoline derivatives with iodine different? |
| Authors of publication |
Rudakov, Boris V.; Stash, Adam I.; Makarov, Gennady I.; Matveychuk, Yury V.; Zherebtsov, Dmitry A.; Bartashevich, Ekaterina V. |
| Journal of publication |
Acta Crystallographica Section C |
| Year of publication |
2018 |
| Journal volume |
74 |
| Journal issue |
8 |
| a |
21.3218 ± 0.0016 Å |
| b |
8.6006 ± 0.0006 Å |
| c |
25.2773 ± 0.0019 Å |
| α |
90° |
| β |
112.768 ± 0.002° |
| γ |
90° |
| Cell volume |
4274.2 ± 0.5 Å3 |
| Cell temperature |
120 ± 2 K |
| Ambient diffraction temperature |
120 ± 2 K |
| Number of distinct elements |
6 |
| Space group number |
15 |
| Hermann-Mauguin space group symbol |
C 1 2/c 1 |
| Hall space group symbol |
-C 2yc |
| Residual factor for all reflections |
0.0671 |
| Residual factor for significantly intense reflections |
0.0435 |
| Weighted residual factors for significantly intense reflections |
0.1047 |
| Weighted residual factors for all reflections included in the refinement |
0.116 |
| Goodness-of-fit parameter for all reflections included in the refinement |
1.021 |
| Diffraction radiation wavelength |
0.71073 Å |
| Diffraction radiation type |
MoKα |
| Has coordinates |
Yes |
| Has disorder |
No |
| Has Fobs |
Yes |
For the version history of this entry, please navigate to main COD server.
The link is:
https://www.crystallography.net/2021189.html